The commercial sector of Adams Morgan
is primarily focused along 18th Street and Columbia Road.
On the former of these two routes, many of these commercial venues
are re-purposed rowhouses. In this section of the neighborhood, the
additional exchange value brought in by these properties (additional
rent generated by renting to commercial, instead of residential,
tenants) has clearly overshadowed the use value of those previously
living in those buildings.
However, this situation is complicated
by the fact that many of these buildings are mixed use. This allows
for the remaining residents to have their use values of their homes
increase due to the proximity to shops and restaurants.
Mixed use
The central question on the use versus
exchange debate (as presented in Logan and Molotch) should be “whose
use values are being impacted and to what end?” not “if and why
do increases in exchange values always come at the determent of use
values?”. For example, a nightclub can increase the use value of a
neighborhood for a single person in the 20-30 age group, but can
decrease the use value of that neighborhood for a family with
children.
Bars, bars everywhere!
As I noted previously, most purely
residential structures in Adams Morgan and the surrounding
communities are well maintained and public space is respected by the
general community. This not increases the exchange value of the
residential and commercial property in the neighborhood (because a
safe community can command higher real-estate prices) but also
increases the use value of the community for the residents, as well
maintained buildings inspire a sense of pride in residents, and well
maintained public space encourages residents go outdoors.
Well maintained buildings
In this case, the use value is
increased for all groups. Those moving into the neighborhood can
utilize its commercial and recreational areas, while long time
residents can use the strong sense of community brought about by
pride in residence to build their social networks.
Throughout the neighborhood, several
condominium buildings were advertizing units for sale. While these
advertisements did not have prices listed, one can only assume they
cater to those of higher incomes who tend to place exchange value
over use value. I noticed several Southeby's International reality
signs in front of buildings, a general indicator that they command
high exchange values.
Typical condominium building
I also examined the cars lining the
street. Very few were noticeably high dollar, but many of them were
recent models. The majority of them were in very good condition,
indicating a high upper class neighborhood.
Most cars are relatively new
Community gatherings can also affect
the use value versus exchange value balance. When I was there most
recently, the Adams Morgan Pet-A-Palooza was taking place, and the
demographic was skewed accordingly, an example of use value
benefiting exchange value for a particular group.
In addition, many community
establishments serve the needs of minorities. School banners are
posted with one side in Spanish and the other in English, for
example. This directly contributes to increased use values for
members of the community that do not have a thorough understanding of
English.
Overall, I feel that use values and
exchange values are fairly well balanced for all groups in Adams
Morgan, and that they are somewhat reciprocal to each other, with
certain aspects of the built environment that increase exchange value
also serving to increase use value.
Great idea to show how use values and exchange values interact. It will be good to examine some of the neighborhood debates (in local newspapers or neighborhood listservs) to see where the neighborhood political differences are. All neighborhoods have some sort of political battles because people disagree on resources, plans for the future, etc.
ReplyDelete